ABSTRACT
We investigated the usefulness of the method of producing sedation with midazolam and reversing with antagonist flumazenil in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Twenty-five adult outpatients underwent diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy 3 min after having an intravenous injection of 5 mg of midazolam for sedation, and received 0.25 mg of flumazenil intravenously 5 min after the removal of the endoscope. Blood pressure, heart rate, and percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured, recorded, and compared at nine points : 1 min before midazolam injection, 2 min after midazolam injection, 1, 3, and 5 min after the insertion of the endoscope, 1 and 3 min after the removal of the endoscope, 1 min after flumazenil injection, and their awakening time at which they are easily able to respond to verbal commands. Fifteen minntes after their awakening, we asked those patients about their memory during the endoscopy and evaluated their pain with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A significant decrease in systolic blood pressure was noted 2 min after midazolam injection. But the systolic blood pressure measured 1 min after the insertion of the endoscope significantly increased when compared with the level 2 min after midazolam injection. Then it gradually started decreasing. Although the systolic blood pressures 1 min after flumazenil injection and at their awakening time increased slightly, the levels were significantly lower than those 1 min before midazolam injection. The heart rate increased to the maximum 1 min after the insertion of the endoscope. Then it gradually started decreasing. The heart rates 1 min after flumazenil injection and at their awakening time decreased significantly when compared with those 1 min after the insertion of the endoscope. SpO2 significantly decreased from 97.6±1.6% 1 min before midazolam injection to 95.7±2.5% 2 min after midazolam injection and remained depressing around 95% during the endoscopy. However, SpO2 recovered 96.6±2.0% at their awakening time. Two patients had a vague memory but all the rest had no memory recollection at all of what happened during the examination. VAS was 20 mm for one patient and 0 mm for another patient. We showed the clinical usefulness of the method of antagonizing with flumazenil after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed on patients given an i.v. injection of midazolam, because this method might provide a minimal circulatory change due to some protection against hemodynamics stress in response to manipulation of the endoscope, anterograde amnesia, and disappearance of pain. However, we should take care of respiratory depression of the patient during endoscopy.
Subject(s)
Midazolam , Injections , FlumazenilABSTRACT
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is an invasive examination. Cardiovascular and respiratory adverse effects are commonly observed in patients undergoing endoscopy. We investigated prospectively the cardiovascular and respiratory changes every oneminute before, during and after routine endoscopy. Sixteen healthy adult patients were enrolled in this study. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate and percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation (SpO<SUB>2</SUB>) were recorded every one-minute throughout the procedure. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased significantly one minute after the insertion of the endoscope. Increases in pulse rate were noted after the insertion of the endoscope. Rate pressure product increased significantly one minute after the insertion of the endoscope. No significant change in SpO<SUB>2</SUB> was observed during endoscopy. Our results indicated that upper gastrointestinal endoscopy might induce cardiovascular stress and abnormality. Therefore, we should carefully insert and manipulate upper gastrointestinal endoscope.
ABSTRACT
An 87-year-old woman with unknown fever origin was admitted to our internal department. We could not determine the fever origin from clinical findings, serious blood data, urine data, bacteriological data, and images obtained by ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. Body inflammatory findings did not respond to several antibiotics we used. Gallium scintiphotography revealed abnormal radioisotope uptake in the bilateral inguinal region. And ultrasonography and enhanced computed tomography showed tumors in front of the bilateral femur neck. Moreover, bone scintiphotography (<SUP>99m</SUP>Tc) revealed abnormal radioisotope uptake in the bilateral hip joints. We performed resection of the right inguinal tumor. The tumor was solid mass 30×20×20mm in size. It was covered with an articular capsule in front of the right femur neck. We identified the mass as bilateral tuberculous granulation with Langhans-type giant cells pathologically. It was only with difficulty that we firmly diagnosed the case as tuberculous arthritis of bilateral hip joints because the fever origin was unknown. It is important to diagnose tuberculous arthritis by use of various imaging techniques. We should take tuberculous infection into consideration when we encounter a case of arthritis of unknown fever origin or a case of antibiotics resistant arthritis.